Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Bureaucrats: Love Them or Leave Them


The anti health care reform lobbyists, and general opposition, often scream “Washington bureaucrats are going to run our health care!” Let’s consider that statement:


Who would you rather have making health policy decisions for you: a Washington democratically elected representative, or a corporate bureaucrat who literally fights against people’s health care needs for a living?


Bureaucrat has been given a negative connotation from Conservative linguistic magicians wishing to diminish the role of government in our lives. Unfortunately for them there are plenty of employees who know they are bureaucrats and proud of their work. If bureaucrats are to be defined as policy makers, than the corporate bureaucrats of private for profit insurance companies should be our worse nightmare. They are the bureaucrats that the Conservatives define so derogatorily. They are traditionally the health policy micro managers, the leaders of corporate monopolistic clusters with impenetrable walls around them. We should not favor them over government democratic control. Bureaucrats don’t make most decisions in Washington D.C., they are usually the ones carrying out decisions. The bureaucrats are the paper pushers, the management, and the middle management that work the greasy gears of our government. They are the pen pushers, the administrators, members of a hierarchy of control, or workers of any organized group. Very few bureaucrats are policy makers, just policy followers.


The decisions are largely in the hands of our representatives, the elected ones, the accountable ones, the ones who can get thrown out on their keesters by voters. Again I implore; when it comes to health care policy, we should not favor corporate executives over government, democratic control.


Try throwing out a corporate executive who decided to call your life saving treatment “experimental,” and save a bundle for his insurance company. Try holding a private industry accountable; it doesn’t happen, the people can not move corporations. In the end it always takes the intervention of one or more elected representatives. Don’t take my word for it; try even phoning the office of one of these unaccountable insurance company executives.

2 comments:

James Mason said...

Main Entry: bu•reau•cra•cy
Pronunciation: byu-'rä-kr&-sE, by&-, by&r-'ä-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -cies
Etymology: French bureaucratie, from bureau + -cratie -cracy
1 a : a body of nonelective government officials b : an administrative policy-making group
2 : government characterized by specialization of functions, adherence to fixed rules, and a hierarchy of authority
3 : a system of administration marked by officialism, red tape, and proliferation

barbaraanne said...

I recommend this article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/19/magazine/19healthcare-t.html

It talks about a govt-rationed health-care program. One of my favorite quotes is, "When a Washington Post journalist asked Daniel Zemel, a Washington rabbi, what he thought about federal agencies putting a dollar value on human life, the rabbi cited a Jewish teaching explaining that if you put one human life on one side of a scale, and you put the rest of the world on the other side, the scale is balanced equally. Perhaps that is how those who resist health care rationing think."

Yes, that is how we think.

Then the article asks, "So why is it that those who accept that we put a price on life when it comes to consumer safety refuse to accept it when it comes to health care?"

My answer: because everyone with a disability or terminal illness has the unalienable right to live until their last moment, with dignity, care, sacrifice, and responsibility from all their relatives and friends to provide that dignity. There is no choice. This is what you do.

For me the criminals are the pharmaceutical companies, who price drugs, which would allow terminally ill patients to live an extra year, out of reach for any program trying to base its priviliges on the best cost for the dollar. The drug companies overprice on purpose.

Then they insult our intelligence by saying that the extra money Americans have to pay for drugs goes to research.

I am not sure that a government-run program would be any kinder than an HMO, and that if I ever got cancer, I'd blow my brains out rather than pay the hospitals and drug companies, because those criminals are not getting my money.

Post a Comment

Your comments and better ideas are very welcomed and will be posted.